Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01329 12
Original file (01329 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

SJN
Docket No: 01329-12
5 December 2012

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 December 2012. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve and began a period of
active duty for training on 16 August 1974. The Board found that
you were honorably released on 12 February 1975 and transferred
back to your reserve unit with an obligation of 24 July 1980. On
19 May 1976, you were informed of your continued absences from
regularly scheduled drills and directed to contact your reserve
unit. On 1 June 1976, you were counseled concerning your
unsatisfactory participation. At that time, you were informed
that you were being processed for assignment to involuntary
active duty and that if disapproved, that administrative
discharge action could occur. On 24 July 1980, you were
convicted by civil authorities of several counts of murder and
appealing your death sentence. You received a general discharge
on that same day because of the appeals that were taking place
since your conviction.

Characterization of service is based in part on conduct marks
assigned on a periodic basis. Your conduct average was 1.5. At
the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required
for a fully honorable characterization of service.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, record of
service, the reason for your discharge, and desire to upgrade
your characterization of service. Nevertheless, the Board
concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change
in your characterization of service given the fact that you were
warned of the consequence of failing to attend regularly
scheduled drills, involvement with civil authorities, and failure
to attain the required average in conduct. The Board believed
you were fortunate to receive a general characterization of
service considering the very serious nature of your civil
conviction. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, thé burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

> ear

W. DEAN PFEIL E
Executive Direc

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05852-00

    Original file (05852-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In this regard, your enlistment You On 30 November When informed of the recommendation, you elected to You received a general discharge from At that time you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02027-07

    Original file (02027-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 11 July 1980. After review by the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08703-01

    Original file (08703-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09683-07

    Original file (09683-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    .A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Characterization of service is based in part on conduct and proficiency averages computed from marks assigned on a periodic basis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00550-07

    Original file (00550-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2008. On 29 May 1984 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03379-11

    Original file (03379-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. About two months later, on 7 June 1972, you received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for disobedience, absence from your appointed place of duty, and disrespect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3840-13

    Original file (NR3840-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 12 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in ‘support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03990-98

    Original file (03990-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00941-08

    Original file (00941-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 Augugt 2008. On 6 March 1978 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfadtory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. : Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03039-08

    Original file (03039-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2008. On 21 August 1985 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated from the USMCR with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...